Talk:Type 100/@comment-26797523-20150731185200/@comment-26797523-20150803002052

Don't get me wrong, I still think the Type 100 is a viable gun. It's just that the Thompson is one step ahead of the T-100 attachment-wise, and not to mention the PPSh. Speaking of which, here's an experiment. Player A uses the Type 100 as his go-to SMG. Player B uses the PPSh-41. Player A is accurate in close quarters, and can kill someone at med-long range. Player B is less accurate, explaining the PPSh-41. Player  A could nail Player B at medium range, but at close range, Player B could hose Player A, because missing shots of a PPSh-41 is less consequential than missing shots with a Type 100.